Attempting to comprehend the technological advancements that my 80-year-old grandmothers have witnessed throughout their lives is incredibly challenging. They grew up during a time when the introduction of color televisions was a groundbreaking development. They actively participated in the civil rights movement and witnessed the remarkable transition from very few households owning televisions to virtually everyone having large colored flat-screens . In their youth, communicating with family across long distances primarily involved writing letters, followed by brief phone calls from their home landlines which were limited by the cost of long distance minutes. Now, with the advent of cellphones, they can easily reach out to loved ones, which also have the incredible ability to video conference with anyone, regardless of location or time zone.
It’s truly mind-boggling to imagine how my grandmothers managed to navigate their lives amidst the constant influx of new technologies. With each passing generation of advancements, the burdens that plagued our ancestors—such as the search for life’s meaning during challenging times—became less pressing. In fact, the significant amount of our ancestors waking hours were spent grappling with these existential dilemmas. Which is why throughout history, communities have played a vital role in providing support during difficult times. Since having people whom you could rely on was essential when faced with adversity. Additionally, these communities offered opportunities for sharing joyful moments, celebrating achievements, and finding solace during the most challenging times. The concept of “communities” is complex and multifaceted, and it will be explored further as we delve into this topic. For now, I will provide subtle hints that point towards its definition and significance.
However, with the advent of technology, one of my grandmothers found it remarkably convenient to distance herself from family members she did not particularly get along with. She had access to resources that allowed her to selectively interact with only those family members she liked. This newfound ability to curate her social interactions was a significant change compared to the past. Now, let’s consider individuals who grew up during this transformative period but harbored strong dislike for their family or community. They were no longer bound by circumstances beyond their control. With the aid of technology, they had the means to travel, relocate, pursue new job opportunities, and essentially shape their lives according to their own desires. This “freedom” allowed them to break away from unfavorable family or community dynamics, enabling them to establish new paths based on their new found beliefs and aspirations. Persistence and dedication to their newfound principles played a crucial role in this process.
The emergence of new technologies has introduced distractions that can divert people’s attention from the significance of family and community. These technological advancements provide individuals with a convenient way to avoid dealing with familial challenges or confronting situations they cannot control. As a result, the value placed on family and communal ties has been compromised, leading to a slow, but subtle, erosion of these important connections.

The Advent of the Printing Press.
In the 15th century, the invention of the printing press revolutionized the dissemination of information. Prior to its arrival, obtaining a book was a laborious process, often requiring commissioned scribes to meticulously transcribe texts. Even for religious works, the individuals who wrote them were sponsored, although not necessarily in the same profit-driven manner as today. These skilled professionals, known as scribes, approached their craft with an artistic touch. Crafting ink was a time-consuming task, feathers had to be carefully sharpened or sourced from specific birds, and parchment or paper required various plants or animal hides, as both were required for writing and replicating texts word for word. Moreover, spelling lacked standardization, and words were often spelled phonetically, which made reading a much slower process.
Prior to the invention of the printing press, books and even writing itself were relatively scarce commodities. Owning a book was a rare occurrence, often limited to cases where one inherited or received it as a special gift, such as for marriage. Common people had almost no access to books, and the privilege of possessing a library was primarily reserved for kings, emperors, universities, and major religious institutions. Additionally, the lack of centralized education further hindered widespread literacy, with many individuals having no reason or means to learn how to read beyond basic numeracy.
Throughout history, the literate class predominantly consisted of deeply devout individuals within religious orders or clergy members. Scholars, too, were part of this educated elite, often originating from longstanding scholarly traditions or aristocratic backgrounds that allowed them the luxury of extensive and in-depth education before assuming leadership roles within their respective realms. These individuals were ordained or destined to follow a path in line with their profession or life’s calling, which entailed a commitment to intellectual pursuits. In essence, reading and literacy were primarily associated with the wealthy, high-born individuals, or those involved in religious affairs.
The introduction of mass-produced papers and the dissemination of information through the printing press eliminated the need for specialized knowledge to interpret specific words or phrases within historical texts. This development had a profound impact on the accessibility of literature, including biblical texts, Shakespearean works, and the writings of ancient philosophers. As a result, the desire and ability to read became more attainable for a wider population. With the newfound availability of printed materials, even middle-class working individuals gained access to educational resources that could teach them how to read. While books remained relatively expensive, they were no longer completely out of reach for the average person. The increasing affordability and availability of books meant that individuals from various socioeconomic backgrounds could engage with written knowledge, expanding their intellectual horizons and fostering a greater literacy across the world.
While other mediums, such as radio, television, and the desktop internet, emerged in attempts to supplant the dominance of printed materials, they were limited in their capabilities until the late 1990s. These alternative forms of communication struggled to match the vastness and scope of the printed word. They were constrained by their technological limitations, mobility, and had yet to fully realize their potential. The printed medium, with its tangible books, newspapers, pamphlets and broad distribution, remained a cornerstone of information dissemination and cultural expression for centuries. It fostered a rich literary tradition, allowing writers to convey their ideas, stories, and knowledge to an ever-expanding audience. Only with the advent of advanced digital technologies and the internet’s widespread accessibility did alternative mediums begin to catch up and challenge the supremacy of the printed word.
Books possessed the remarkable ability to transcend distances and encapsulate entire worlds within their pages. As J.Z. Young astutely noted, “for the medieval type of brain… making true statements depended on fitting sensory experience with the symbols of religion.” Prior to widespread literacy, individuals primarily relied on their personal experiences and the narratives dictated by the dominant religious framework within their culture. However, the advent of books transformed the human brain. It enabled individuals to expand their perspectives beyond the confines of religious precepts and compare their own thoughts and experiences with those articulated by diverse authors through the written word. Reading provided a gateway to a broader understanding of the world, encompassing a myriad of viewpoints and knowledge that extended beyond religious boundaries. It allowed individuals to engage in critical thinking, questioning, and reflection, encouraging them to explore different perspectives and challenge their own beliefs.
While radio, television, and the internet have their merits in terms of broadcasting information and entertainment, they lack the corporeality and direct engagement that books provide. The ability to hold a book in one’s hands, flip through its pages, and establish a personal connection with the text is an unparalleled experience for those who value the written word. In a world that was becoming increasingly digitized, the book remained a symbol of mobility and a steadfast companion for avid readers. Its unique portability allowed individuals to carry an entire world with them, empowering them to indulge in the pleasure of reading at their convenience and fostering a deep appreciation for literacy.
THE COMMANDING VOICES FROM THE BOX: radio
The preceding section should not be interpreted as a means to diminish the immense impact that radio, as a form of communication and as a disseminator of information, had on people in the 20th century. To the contrary, radio served as a unifying force that was previously inconceivable. While books allowed for thousands or millions of people to read a text and grasp its general essence or engage in discussions and debates over its message or purpose, the process of reading required individual time and interpretation, varying across different stages of people’s lives.
In contrast, radio was not a recorded medium but rather an accessible one, whether through car radios or plugged-in receivers. This meant that if you and others gathered around a stereo, you could collectively tune into a shared experience. It extended beyond just you or the people within arm’s reach; anyone who tuned into the station could listen to a sports event, a boxing match, the speeches of world leaders, or personalities providing news, commentary, entertainment or insights.
It is important to recognize and appreciate the significant role that radio played in shaping the cultural fabric of the 20th century. Its ability to transmit live events and connect people through shared listening experiences was a transformative phenomenon that united communities and brought the world closer together. Beyond the realm of books, radio played a crucial role in fostering a sense of cohesiveness among people. This was particularly significant because the events that were accessible for national or even regional consumption were limited in scope. Radio served as a unifying medium, bringing together moments of despair, unity, freedom, and entertainment into a single relatable zeitgeist.
Radio provided a platform to disseminate news and information that impacted the entire country, such as the devastating events of Pearl Harbor. In times of adversity, radio became a rallying point, uniting people in their efforts to rebuild and move forward. Radio also brought people together in moments of triumph, achievement and calls for civil/social change, like the Martin Luther King Jr. “I have a dream” speech. It allowed the nation to collectively be on notice, celebrate milestones and groundbreaking accomplishments.
In essence, radio had the power to unify diverse worlds under a single wave of a signal. It created a shared understanding and a collective consciousness, enabling people from various backgrounds and regions to connect with a common zeitgeist. It played a pivotal role in shaping national identity and fostering a sense of belonging during pivotal moments in history. The radio brought a sense of immediacy, making it possible for individuals across vast distances to be plugged into the same experience and be part of a collective audience. Radio, with its ability to reach and engage a wide audience, transcended physical boundaries and facilitated a sense of togetherness. It united individuals across vast distances, creating a shared narrative that helped shape and define the cultural fabric of society.
Indeed, radio, being a verbal form of communication, had the power to spark conversations rather than stifle them. However, the emergence of television and cable broadcasting was on the horizon. While television encompassed many of the same attributes as radio, with the added advantage of visual imagery, it couldn’t quite rival the inherent mobility of radios.
Television revolutionized the way information and entertainment were delivered, providing a captivating visual experience that engaged viewers on a new level. It brought stories, news, and events to life with vivid pictures and dynamic audio. Yet, despite its visual appeal, television couldn’t match the portability and flexibility offered by radios.
Radios over time could be easily carried and moved around, allowing people to tune in to their favorite programs and engage with content anywhere they went.
While televisions quickly became a centerpiece in many households, anchoring families to a specific location, radios continued to offer a versatile and portable means of communication. They accompanied people on their daily activities, becoming a constant companion that connected them to the world.
The mobility of radios, coupled with their ability to stimulate conversations and foster a sense of community, made them a cherished medium. Even with the introduction of television and its visual allure, radios maintained their significance as a portable source of connection and communication that could be enjoyed anytime, anywhere.
the visual war: TELEVISION
There is a profound analysis that delves into the impact of television, examining its technological advancements, visual quality, and significance. Television represents an era where video and recorded content transitioned from being a costly luxury to becoming a staple and a piece of furniture in living rooms across the nation, eventually reaching almost unanimous adoption.
The evolution of television reflects the remarkable journey of accessibility. Initially, owning a television was a privilege limited to those who could afford it. However, as time progressed, television sets became more affordable and accessible to a broader population. What was once considered a luxury item gradually transformed into a common household possession.
Television not only changed the way we consumed visual content but also revolutionized entertainment and information dissemination. It brought the world into people’s homes, allowing them to witness historic events, enjoy captivating storytelling, and stay informed about the world’s happenings. Television became a centerpiece of family gatherings, providing shared experiences and sparking discussions. As technology advanced, television screens became thinner, colors became more vibrant, and the clarity of images improved significantly. These advancements further enhanced the viewing experience, captivating audiences and immersing them in a visual feast.
When television first emerged, it was far from being considered a piece of furniture. In its early days, television sets were predominantly black and white and came with a hefty price tag. Only a select few could afford them, and even if you were fortunate enough to own one, it was typically a single unit rather than multiple sets scattered throughout the house.
At its inception, television shared similarities with the radio in terms of its ability to connect people through shows and news broadcasts. However, unlike the radio, television introduced a visual element that added a new dimension to the viewing experience.
During the early stages, the number of available television channels and shows was limited. There were no means of recording broadcasts, at least until a couple of decades later when cassette tapes allowed for recording, but even then, it required manually setting up the recording while the program was live. As a result, the viewing experience was shaped by the finite amount of content, creating a sense of familiarity and shared experiences among viewers.
The limited selection of shows also gave rise to the concept of primetime, when the most popular programs were scheduled to air. Since on-demand options were virtually nonexistent, viewers eagerly awaited for their favorite shows during specific time slots, enhancing the anticipation and importance of prime time television.
The early era of television, characterized by black and white screens and limited programming, fostered a unique sense of connection among viewers. It brought people together around shared entertainment and news experiences, while also reflecting the technological constraints and evolving nature of the medium. Over time, as technology advanced and on-demand options became more prevalent, television would undergo significant transformations, reshaping the way we consume and interact with media.
The Evolving Problem
However, with the advent of television, many people became easily distracted during prime hours when the best shows or news anchors were on. This created a dilemma as entire generations’ worth of cultural content were presented as a form of ritualistic commemoration during these coveted time slots.
The transition to digital information delivery had a significant impact. While the printing press made reading more accessible, it is a skill that is typically learned and practiced from childhood. It requires focused attention, time, and the ability to retain information in one’s memory. Radio, on the other hand, offered an auditory experience that bypassed the manual process of reading and directly delivered the spoken word into ones personal space. However, television tapped into a fundamental ability that most individuals possess: the capability to process complex visuals with our eyes.
The eyes, being the second most intricate organ after the brain itself, have the remarkable capacity to interpret and make sense of the visual world around us. Television harnessed this innate ability, presenting information and entertainment through a medium that engaged our visual senses. It offered a rich sensory experience, combining moving images, colors, and visual storytelling.
The introduction of television expanded the realm of communication by providing a powerful visual medium that surpassed the limitations of reading or listening, while also incorporating them. It allowed for the transmission of complex ideas, emotions, and narratives through captivating visuals. Yet a person never had to leave there home or go to a theatre to experience this like that had to previously.
The fusion of sight and sound offered by television revolutionized the way we interacted with media, creating a new form of communication that appealed to the widest of audiences. As a result, television became an influential cultural force, shaping our perceptions, values, and understanding of the world.
In the present day, when a child is seated in front of a television, their brain, fascination, and imagination are instantly captivated. There is a primal aspect that gets triggered by images, which is why art has always been revered and considered sacred. Throughout history, many religious groups have either worshiped or expressed disdain for images attempting to depict the divine. The presence of an image narrows our focus and invokes a unique response. For those who worship tangible objects, it represents a manifestation of the divine. On the other hand, those who oppose such practices argue that the divine cannot and should not be confined or disrespected through a physical representation, such as a sculpture.
Television built upon the auditory aspect of radio and added the power of imagery, allowing hours to pass in the blink of an eye. However, for a long time, owning a television screen was an expensive endeavor. Whether it was due lack of portability, cable connections, or VHS players, televisions were confined to specific locations. As a result, radio and books still held their place in the world, offering alternative sources of information and entertainment. While television became a fixture in homes, radio found its niche in cars and during travel, while books remained a valuable resource for learning or as a means of entertainment when neither radio nor television were readily available.
However, its initial constraints, both in terms of cost and availability, allowed other mediums to maintain their significance. Despite the immersive power of television, the enduring allure of radio and the timeless appeal of books persisted, providing alternative avenues for information, imagination, and storytelling.
As technology advanced and televisions became more affordable and accessible, their presence expanded, eventually becoming a ubiquitous feature in households worldwide. This transformation reshaped the way we consume media and connect with the world. Television’s ability to instantly transport us to different places, share experiences, and transmit information has made it a cornerstone of modern society.
However, it is important to recognize that through each of these mediums, people were often seeking distractions from the hardships of life, a practice commonly referred to today as “decompressing.” Distractions in of themselves are not inherently negative; they can provide much-needed respite and entertainment. Yet, if these distractions begin to isolate individuals from the connections they once relied upon for a sense of purpose, self-identity, belonging, or community, then piece by piece, they erode the foundations that make communities distinct and cohesive entities.
While technology and various forms of media offer convenient means of escape, it is crucial to maintain a balance between engaging with these distractions and nurturing the relationships and communal ties that foster our well-being and sense of belonging. It is when we prioritize the virtual world over authentic connections that we risk losing the richness of human interaction and the support systems that communities provide and necessitate.
In our pursuit of decompressing, we must remain mindful of the importance of maintaining genuine human connections and actively engaging with our communities. These connections are the lifeblood of our shared experiences, mutual support, and collective growth. By striking a healthy balance between the allure of distractions and the nourishment derived from genuine human connection, we can preserve the essence of what makes communities thrive and endure in an increasingly digital age.
It is important to acknowledge that technologies that help facilitate connections to others and expanding one’s sense of community are not inherently negative. In fact, it can be a positive outcome of technological advancements and the broader access to information and diverse perspectives. However, problems arise when community becomes defined solely by superficial factors such as race, economic status, or secular education.
When we allow these external markers to define our communities, we risk perpetuating values that were never corner stones of communities or life itself. True community should be based on shared values, empathy, and a genuine desire to understand and support one another. It should transcend superficial differences and foster growth, respect, and unity among its members.
The last two Paragraphs beg the question of what is “wrong with building a community based on those factors”.
Superficial commonalities such as hobbies, appearance or activities do not necessarily imply shared values or a deep sense of community. Engaging in small talk or participating in a particular activity may provide initial connections, but true community is built on shared values, beliefs, religion, or worldview.
When we encounter challenges or require support, it is often those who share our fundamental values and beliefs who are most likely to provide the assistance and understanding we need. These shared principles serve as a foundation for trust, empathy, and a sense of belonging within a community.
While engaging in activities or having common interests can be enjoyable and provide a starting point for connections, it is essential to foster relationships based on shared values in order to create or maintain a genuine and enduring sense of community. By actively seeking out individuals who align with our core beliefs and principles, we can establish communities that go beyond superficial connections and cultivate meaningful relationships that support personal growth and well-being.
Ultimately, it is the shared values, beliefs, and worldviews that bind individuals together and form the basis for strong, supportive communities.
The proliferation of entertainment mediums like the printing press, radio, and TV undoubtedly brought about significant changes in society and communal dynamics. However, by the time the 1980s arrived, it became apparent that these distractions had contributed to the fragmented state of communities. Despite the presence of various sources of information and diverse opinions, people were often confined to a limited range of perspectives due to the restricted access to alternative sources.
This limitation had an impact on both individuals seeking out unconventional ideas and “creators” attempting to disseminate such information. People with unique or unconventional viewpoints found it challenging to connect with like-minded individuals or access resources that could nurture and support their distinctive beliefs. Similarly, creators who aimed to share alternative perspectives were often hindered by the limited means available to reach a wider audience.
The resulting landscape fostered a sense of isolation for those whose ideas deviated from the mainstream, as well as constrained the diversity of information and viewpoints available to the broader public. Communities became more polarized, as the potential for meaningful dialogue and understanding between different groups was diminished by people being distracted by visual screens.
At the same time, the digital age has provided new avenues for individuals to explore differing perspectives, connect with like-minded communities, and share their ideas on a global scale. This shift has brought both opportunities and challenges, as the abundance of information now seems to lead to information overload and the proliferation of echo chambers.
The WEB and its sticky fingers.
Let’s take a step back and examine the earlier days of computers. In the 1960s, computers did exist, but they were significantly different from the compact and powerful devices we have today. They were large, occupying vast spaces, and their computing power was relatively limited compared to modern-day calculators.
During that time, computer technology was primarily accessible to large organizations, such as companies like IBM, academic researchers and government agencies. These entities had computers that were primarily used within local networks, and the speed at which data could be processed and transferred was considerably slower than what we are accustomed to today.
Additionally, using computers during that era required a certain level of expertise and the ability to create programs or applications for their specific use, known to some people as floppy disk programs. Unlike now, where we have a wealth of information readily available, computers at that time did not offer an abundance of pre-existing data or resources.
The internet’s origins can be traced back to the late 1960s with the development of ARPANET, a network created by the U.S. Department of Defense for research and communication purposes. It was through the development of ARPANET, a precursor to the internet, that the foundations for global networking and information exchange were laid. Its initial focus was on facilitating information sharing and collaboration between researchers and academics. Over time, the advancements in technology, increased computing power, and the evolution of the internet infrastructure over the subsequent decades led to the widespread accessibility and availability of information that we experience today.
The growth of the internet and technological advancements over time have played a crucial role in transforming computers into the powerful and accessible devices we rely on today.
As home computers started to become more common and the internet entered its early stages, it faced significant challenges in competing with television. Navigating the internet during this time, the late 1980 through the early 2000’s, required a significant investment of time and effort to master. The learning curve was steep, and it took hours and even weeks to become proficient in using the available technology.
Additionally, the internet had limited content compared to the vast array of programs and visually captivating graphics offered by television and movies. While there were some educational programs and basic applications available, they often lacked the engaging visuals and immersive experience that television provided.
During the early 2000s, with the rise of the dotcom boom, computers and the internet were predominantly used by professionals such as traders, gamers, and writers. Laptops, though becoming more accessible, were still relatively expensive, with limited processing power and short battery life. Being connected to the internet required a physical connection to a landline, which meant that for many people the phone line couldn’t be used simultaneously.
These factors contributed to the continued dominance of television as the preferred medium for entertainment and information consumption during that time. The internet and computers were primarily seen as tools for specific professional, or advanced leisure purposes rather than mainstream sources of entertainment and communication.
As computer games started to emerge and become more accessible to the average person, the popularity of computers began to rise. People found enjoyment and entertainment in these games, and the accessibility of computer systems improved, making them easier to use. Messaging services like AOL, Yahoo, and others also played a significant role in increasing internet usage during this period.
However, it’s important to note that prior to the emergence of platforms like Myspace, Google, and YouTube, internet consumption was still primarily seen as a passing recreation for few people. The internet had yet to fully establish itself as a mainstream source of entertainment and information.
Around the same time that these popular websites began to gain prominence, computers started to become more commonplace in middle-class households. It became increasingly common for households to have both a television and a computer, reflecting the growing popularity of computers as objects of entertainment or learning.
This shift marked a significant turning point in the adoption of computers and the internet by a wider audience. With the rise of user-friendly platforms and the increasing availability of online content, the internet started to transform into a more engaging and immersive medium for entertainment, communication, and information dissemination. The combination of accessible computer systems and the emergence of popular online platforms laid the groundwork for the internet’s eventual transformation into an integral part of our daily lives.
Then the internet introduced a new form of distraction, one characterized by an abundance of choice. Unlike radio and TV, where the available channels and programs were limited, the internet provided a broader range of options, albeit still more limited compared to what we have today. This shift allowed individuals to break free from the constraints of network schedules and broadcaster programming.
With the internet, people gained access to the specific forms of entertainment they desired. Whether it was reading articles, watching videos, playing games, or engaging in various online activities, the internet provided a customizable experience. It opened up a world of unfettered sources and diverse content, all readily accessible and streamed directly into the mind.
The internet’s ability to provide tailored experiences and direct access to a vast array of information and entertainment marked a significant shift in the nature of distractions. It allowed individuals to curate their own digital experiences and explore a multitude of interests, opening up new avenues for discovery, connection, and entertainment.
EDIT FORM________———-
The proliferation of message boards, diverse media, and easily accessible information further contributed to the erosion of traditional communities. People started to develop a false sense of community by connecting with others who shared similar interests. In the past, finding individuals who shared niche hobbies or passions was challenging and limited in scope. However, with the advent of the internet, these barriers began to crumble, allowing people to connect with like-minded individuals on a larger scale.
The internet became a breeding ground for groups and faux pas communities centered around specific interests, allowing individuals to find and engage with others who shared their hobbies, passions, or niche pursuits. The floodgates of superficial connectivity were opened, and people could now tap into a seemingly endless network of individuals who understood and appreciated their interests.
However, it was not until the widespread adoption of smartphones that the containment of these communities fully broke. Smartphones revolutionized the way people accessed the internet and consumed information. With the internet constantly at their fingertips, individuals could now connect with their online communities anytime and anywhere. The portability and convenience of smartphones enabled a seamless integration of online interactions into daily life, blurring the lines between virtual and physical communities.
This shift in technology further exacerbated the fragmentation of traditional communities. While the internet offered a sense of belonging and connection through shared interests, the nature of these communities often lacked the depth and substance found in face-to-face interactions. The ease of online connection through smartphones led to a proliferation of virtual relationships, sometimes at the expense of meaningful real-world connections.
In summary, the internet and its various platforms provided opportunities for individuals to find like-minded communities, but it was the widespread adoption of smartphones that intensified the breakdown of traditional communities, blurring the lines between virtual and physical interactions.
Smartphones, Dumb-communication.
Phones, in their essence, are derived from the power of the written letter. Letters carried a profound significance, conveying emotions, thoughts, and experiences in a way that was often ineffable. They held the ability to bridge the gap between individuals who were separated by distance, enabling them to understand and empathize with one another’s joys, sorrows, and the trials they faced in their absence.
The act of writing a letter to someone you miss had a profound impact. It allowed you to articulate the complexities of your feelings, to share the weight of misfortunes that occurred in their absence, and to provide solace through the written word. The letter possessed a unique ability to preserve and transmit the essence of human connection, serving as a tangible representation of the bond between individuals.
However, with the advent of modern technology, the traditional art of letter writing has “evolved”. The invention of telephones transformed the way we communicate, bringing real-time conversations to the forefront. While the immediacy of phone conversations provided a new level of connection and the ability to convey emotions through voice, they also brought about a different dynamic.
With phone calls, the exchange of thoughts and experiences became more fluid, instantaneous, and ephemeral. The spoken word could convey nuances and emotions that were difficult to capture in writing, adding depth and immediacy to conversations. Yet, at the same time, the fleeting nature of phone calls diminished the sense of permanence that letters once held.
In the digital age, text messages and instant messaging further revolutionized communication. Short, quick messages replaced the longer, heartfelt letters of the past. While this enabled more frequent and convenient exchanges, it also diminished the depth and richness of expression found in traditional letter writing.
In essence, while phones and digital communication have brought us closer together in many ways, they have also changed the nature of our interactions. The letter, with its unique ability to convey deep emotions and connect souls across distances, has evolved into new forms of communication that prioritize immediacy and convenience. Though the essence of human connection remains, the way we express it has shifted in the face of advancing technology.
The telephone, while not able to fully replicate the power of a written letter, played a significant role in bridging distances and fostering connections. Initially, telephone services were quite costly, making them inaccessible to many individuals. Even when people did have access to telephones, they were constrained by limitations, such as the number of minutes they could use or specific times when calls were more affordable to avoid excessive bills.
Similarly to television and the internet, telephones were primarily stationary during their early iterations. They were tethered to a specific location, restricting mobility and limiting the ability to communicate on the go. Additionally, the cost of mobile phones remained high for a considerable time, and their capabilities were constrained. Usage was often limited, with restrictions on minutes and texts.
These factors hindered widespread adoption and hindered the potential of telephones to revolutionize communication. However, advancements in technology and changes in the telecommunications industry eventually led to increased mobility and affordability. Mobile phones became more accessible to a broader range of people, offering greater freedom to communicate from anywhere.
As mobile phones evolved, they transformed into multifunctional devices that not only facilitated voice calls but also allowed for text messaging, internet access, and a wide range of applications. This newfound mobility and versatility revolutionized communication by enabling instant connections and convenient access to information.
Despite their initial limitations and high costs, telephones gradually became indispensable tools for modern communication. They played a pivotal role in connecting people across distances, overcoming the barriers of time and space. While the early generations of telephones had their constraints, they laid the foundation for the transformative power of mobile communication that we experience today.
The introduction of the iPhone in 2008 marked a new era in communication. While it was initially considered expensive during its time (adjusted for inflation), it revolutionized the way we interacted with various media forms. Combining the capabilities of radio, television, telephones, and the internet into a single device, it offered unprecedented convenience and accessibility.
In the early stages, some of these functionalities were limited by technological constraints, detracting from the advantages of other mediums. However, the iPhone’s true breakthrough was its mobility. Unlike previous technologies, it allowed people to carry a diverse range of media and communication tools in their pockets, enabling connections and access to information from anywhere.
In the years that followed, applications and websites emerged, connecting individuals across all corners of the internet. The barriers to disseminating information and content were shattered, as anyone could now become a sensation. It was no longer limited to being propped up by large conglomerates; individuals themselves could captivate audiences through their personality or messages. The power of amplification shifted to the people, as they could share, like, comment, or engage in ways that fueled the algorithms and expanded the reach of compelling content.
This era of mobile devices and widespread internet connectivity opened up new avenues for self-expression, creativity, and community building. The democratization of information and the ability to connect with others on a global scale transformed the way we engage with media and shape our identities in the digital realm. The iPhone and its subsequent iterations paved the way for a dynamic and interconnected digital landscape that continues to evolve and shape our lives.
The Curtain of Community Fell, and the Wall of Ignorant Miscommunications’ was Raised.
With the rise of mobile devices and the proliferation of online platforms, “marginalized” and previously voiceless factions found a platform to express their perspectives, share their stories, and assert their rights. These platforms became spaces where individuals could proudly proclaim their righteousness, express their grievances, and shed light on the mistreatment they had endured. The digital realm lifted the veil of ignorance that shielded many people from recognizing the diverse experiences and struggles within society.
Furthermore, the internet shattered the illusion of community that many individuals had previously held. It exposed the limitations of their perceived connections and highlighted the fragmented nature of society. As people engaged with a wider range of voices and perspectives, they became aware of the complexity and diversity of human experiences. This newfound awareness challenged preconceived notions of unity and forced individuals to confront the realities of a world that both hurt and helped them in different ways. Yet many people just ran back to their eco chambers.
While this proliferation of voices and perspectives had its benefits in terms of empowering marginalized groups and promoting empathy, it also brought forth new challenges. The vastness and diversity of opinions often led to polarization and heightened conflicts, as different groups clashed in the digital arena. It became increasingly difficult to find common ground and foster meaningful dialogue amidst the cacophony of voices. It brought out the Paradox of Tolerance.
In the past half a century, Faux pas communities centered around shared interests such as race, sports, arts, acting or other superficial connectors often faced external scrutiny and criticism. However, with the advent of online expression, individuals now have the ability to express themselves in unprecedented ways, which has shattered the imagined consensus within friendships and relationships. The reality of differing beliefs and opinions has disrupted the previously held notions of unity and shared values.
In genuine communities, discussions about diverse beliefs were once commonplace. These communities were rooted in shared values and faith, where even if individuals disagreed on specific matters, they still held a common core authority or power. Within these communities, disagreements could be handled with respect and a recognition that diverse interpretations of shared values exist. Members of the community could agree to disagree without taking it personally, knowing that there were knowledgeable individuals within the community who could provide guidance and resolution.
However, the current landscape of online expression and the ability to connect with individuals from various backgrounds has highlighted the stark differences in beliefs. The power of interpretation and the absence of a common framework within digital communities have made it challenging to navigate disagreements constructively. The absence of shared values and the abundance of diverse perspectives often lead to personalization of disagreements and a lack of guidance in resolving them.
In this devolving landscape, it is crucial to recognize the importance of genuine communities that are rooted in shared values and faith. These communities provide a foundation for respectful dialogue and the opportunity to learn from one another. While the digital realm offers the potential for connection and expression, it is essential to seek out spaces where shared values can guide discussions and differences can be addressed with understanding and humility.
Due to the prevalence of distractions over the past few centuries, such as television, radio, internet, and now smartphones, people have developed habits of avoiding difficult conversations and lacking the necessary skills to navigate them. The skills that were traditionally learned in childhood, through interactions with family and friends, have been neglected or entirely absent.
Instead, what has been practiced and reinforced are behaviors of decompressing, dissociating, and seeking escapism. When confronted with disagreements or heated emotions, many individuals have developed a habit of turning to technology as a crutch, rather than engaging in introspection or seeking resolution with the people involved. The convenience of technology allows for postponing or avoiding addressing these conflicts, perpetuating a cycle of unresolved issues.
As a result, the crucial skills of self-reflection, conflict resolution, and finding common ground have been neglected. The reliance on technology as a means to avoid discomfort or challenging conversations has hindered personal growth and the development of effective communication skills.
In order to address this issue, it is important for individuals to recognize the patterns of avoidance and actively work towards developing healthier coping mechanisms. This includes engaging in self-reflection, taking time to process emotions, and seeking constructive ways to address conflicts. By fostering a culture of open and honest communication, both online and offline, individuals can begin to rebuild the skills necessary to navigate difficult conversations and promote understanding and resolution.
It is indeed ironic when people express surprise or dismay at the events of 2016, as it was a time when thoughts and opinions that were once quietly held found a more vocal expression, from all of the “crazy” sides. The advent of technology and social media platforms provided a platform for individuals to openly share their beliefs and perspectives. In this new era, previously unspoken or ignored viewpoints were brought to the forefront, forcing people to confront what they were truly intolerant of.
While many advocate for values such as liberalism and love, the reality is that the exposure to diverse opinions revealed the inherent biases and prejudices that existed within society. What was once kept nonverbal, brushed aside, or distracted from, was now being thrust into the spotlight, demanding a response and prompting individuals to make choices.
This shift in dynamics, where differing beliefs and ideologies were being openly expressed, led to polarization and a heightened sense of division among people. The clash between contrasting viewpoints often challenged individuals to confront their own biases and reassess their values. It became evident that true acceptance and understanding required more than mere words or superficial declarations.
Expanding upon the previous essay on secularism, it becomes apparent that the erosion of traditions and values was not only influenced by the gradual shift in societal norms but was also accelerated by the pervasive use of technologies of distraction. This intrusion of technology permeated the attention spans of people across generations, including the youth, adults, and even the older generation who were once considered the guardians of tradition.
While there is no definitive guidebook on parenting, the lessons imparted and the values instilled by parents greatly influence their children’s perception of what is considered appropriate and valuable. If parents prioritize their engagement with technology over the nurturing and guidance of their children, it is likely that the children will also adopt technology as a means of distraction, mirroring the behavior they observed in their parents.
The allure of technology, with its endless array of distractions and entertainment, can easily overshadow the importance of fostering meaningful connections, engaging in deep conversations, and preserving cultural and traditional practices. The value systems that were once passed down through generations now face competition from the “why not” mentality that technology often promotes. This shift poses a significant challenge to the continuity of communities, religious groups, and cultural traditions.
However, it is crucial for parents to recognize their role in shaping their children’s perspectives and behaviors. By consciously allocating quality time for interpersonal connections, open discussions, and emphasizing the significance of cultural heritage, parents can instill a sense of value and appreciation for traditions in their children. Balancing the use of technology with meaningful interactions can help guide the younger generation toward a more grounded and holistic understanding of the world.
Ultimately, it is a collective responsibility to navigate the intersection of technology and tradition. By fostering an environment that values both the benefits of technological advancements and the preservation of cultural practices, we can strive to create a society that embraces progress while maintaining a sense of identity and tradition.
Having said that, I hold no blame towards my parents, and I believe it is important for others to refrain from blaming their parents as well. In fact, I find myself in awe of previous generations and their ability to navigate a world that lacked the convenience of modern technology. Reflecting on my own life, I acknowledge that I have wasted precious time pursuing trivial matters. However, I am fortunate to have grown up with access to powerful technologies that were already well-established by the time I reached adulthood. I had the advantage of a religious upbringing that served as an anchor to navigate base desires and emotions, even during moments of foolishness. Still, I am amazed by how individuals from earlier generations, who witnessed the rapid transformation of technology before their eyes, managed to resist being completely consumed by it.
If you have ever engaged in meaningful conversations with your grandparents or individuals over the age of 70, you may have a faint grasp of the remarkable technological shifts they have witnessed. However, it is important to consider that they experienced these advancements during their formative years, as each new technological feat emerged, gained popularity, and fundamentally altered the way information is consumed.
It is an abstract concept to imagine growing up with the constant emergence and widespread adoption of groundbreaking technologies. The ability of previous generations to adapt and navigate through these transformative times is truly remarkable. They bore witness to the birth of innovations that shaped the world we live in today, with profound changes in the way we communicate, gather information, and experience the world around us. Their resilience and ability to maintain a sense of self amidst these rapid changes is worthy of admiration and serves as a testament to the strength of human adaptability.
As we reflect on the advancements of technology and its impact on our lives, let us appreciate the struggles and triumphs of those who came before us. Let us learn from their experiences and find a balance between embracing technological progress and preserving the core values and traditions that ground us. By doing so, we can navigate the ever-evolving landscape with wisdom, resilience, and a deep appreciation for the remarkable journey of human innovation.
Prior to the advent of smartphones, the impact of these technologies on communities was largely confined to the realm of entertainment. They influenced how people spent their leisure time: whether they were engaged in learning through books, connecting with a shared media experience through television or radio, or exploring the vast, uncharted territory of the internet. These technologies were initially perceived as tools for convenience, facilitating ease in various aspects of life. Little did we realize that they would also contribute to a world that struggles to find meaning, becoming entangled in distractions to the point where the boundaries between reality and illusion blur. Moreover, they have hindered our ability to effectively communicate with those who hold differing opinions.
At the core of all societies lies the foundation of community. Superficial associations and fleeting connections cannot alleviate the sense of purposelessness or provide the resilience needed to endure through challenging times. In a world filled with pain and uncertainty, true community is essential. It offers support, shared values, and a sense of belonging that transcends shallow interactions. The distractions brought about by technology can often divert our attention away from cultivating meaningful connections and pursuing genuine purpose.
In this digital age, it is crucial that we reexamine the role of technology in our lives. While it offers convenience and endless possibilities, we must not allow it to overshadow the importance of authentic human connections and the pursuit of meaningful experiences. By nurturing genuine community, engaging in open and empathetic dialogue, and rediscovering the value of deep, thoughtful communication, we can navigate the complexities of the modern world with a renewed sense of purpose and connection.
The purpose of each generation should be to strive for improvement and draw wisdom from the lessons of the past. We should resist falling prey to the intricate pitfalls presented by technology. Just as each generation of lions becomes swifter, so too should each new generation embrace the challenge to adapt and develop the necessary skills and habits that enhance their chances of survival.
While we cannot choose the circumstances into which we are born, we have agency over our will to survive and thrive. It is essential to cultivate the qualities and behaviors that have a compounding likelihood of achieving success. This requires a commitment to growth, resilience, and a willingness to learn from the experiences of those who came before us.
In the face of ever-advancing technology, we must exercise discernment and navigate the complexities with intention. Instead of becoming ensnared in the traps set by digital distractions, we can harness the power of technology to enhance our lives and empower ourselves by strengthening our communities. By prioritizing critical thinking, adaptability, and the cultivation of meaningful connections, we can chart a course that not only benefits us individually but also contributes to the collective progress of society, and future generations.
